Home/Papers worth the commute/ConversationOllie MercerConversationvorige maand · on Papers worth the commuteOllie Mercer on “Papers worth the commute”Twelve papers I've genuinely read, mostly to prove my marking is statistically indefensible, best digested on a delayed Central line.6 likes8 commentsShareThe list this is aboutPapers worth the commute11 items8 commentsNewest firstCallum Hayesvorige maandDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?ReplyOllie Mercervorige maandNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.ReplyOllie Mercervorige maandVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.ReplyAdd a reply — sign up to join the conversationReplyReport
Callum Hayesvorige maandDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?Reply
Ollie Mercervorige maandNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.Reply
Ollie Mercervorige maandVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.Reply
TheLysts
Delayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?
Northern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.
Villain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.