Home/Papers worth the commute/ConversationOllie MercerConversationmese scorso · on Papers worth the commuteOllie Mercer on “Papers worth the commute”Twelve papers I've genuinely read, mostly to prove my marking is statistically indefensible, best digested on a delayed Central line.6 likes8 commentsShareThe list this is aboutPapers worth the commute11 items8 commentsNewest firstCallum Hayesmese scorsoDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?ReplyOllie Mercermese scorsoNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.ReplyOllie Mercermese scorsoVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.ReplyAdd a reply — sign up to join the conversationReplyReport
Callum Hayesmese scorsoDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?Reply
Ollie Mercermese scorsoNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.Reply
Ollie Mercermese scorsoVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.Reply
TheLysts
Delayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?
Northern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.
Villain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.