Home/Papers worth the commute/ConversationOllie MercerConversationsidste måned · on Papers worth the commuteOllie Mercer on “Papers worth the commute”Twelve papers I've genuinely read, mostly to prove my marking is statistically indefensible, best digested on a delayed Central line.6 likes8 commentsShareThe list this is aboutPapers worth the commute11 items8 commentsNewest firstCallum Hayessidste månedDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?ReplyOllie Mercersidste månedNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.ReplyOllie Mercersidste månedVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.ReplyAdd a reply — sign up to join the conversationReplyReport
Callum Hayessidste månedDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?Reply
Ollie Mercersidste månedNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.Reply
Ollie Mercersidste månedVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.Reply
TheLysts
Delayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?
Northern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.
Villain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.