1 Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk | Behavioral economics | 1979 | Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky | People value gains and losses asymmetrically, evaluate outcomes relative to a reference point, and overweight low probabilities. | Any time someone asks why users won’t switch to our clearly better thing, I mentally pull up this paper; it explains loss aversion and status quo bias better than any slide I’ve ever made. | Pricing changes, migration plans, churn prevention, and messaging around “upgrade” flows instead of hard switches. | Value function and loss aversion in prospect theory | Medium—mathy in spots but the intuition is gold once you push through. |
|---|
2 A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice | Decision theory / organizational behavior | 1955 | Herbert A. Simon | Real humans and firms don’t optimize perfectly; they satisfice under bounded rationality and limited information. | This is my antidote to over‑fit dashboards—reminds me that both our users and our teams are hacking their way to “good enough,” not solving global optimization problems. | Scoping MVPs, designing defaults, and arguing against yet another complex configuration screen. | Bounded rationality and satisficing | Medium—old‑school econ prose but very readable if you’re caffeinated. |
|---|
3 The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two | Cognitive psychology | 1956 | George A. Miller | Working memory has a limited capacity (around 7 ±2 chunks), which constrains how much information people can process at once. | Whenever a settings page starts looking like a CVS receipt, I think of this and start deleting options like I’m over the salary cap. | Navigation design, form design, and deciding how many choices to put on a screen before users mentally bail. | Chunking in short‑term memory | Low—surprisingly fun read for something older than my parents’ first car. |
|---|
4 The Strength of Weak Ties | Social network theory / sociology | 1973 | Mark S. Granovetter | Loose, “weak” social connections are disproportionately powerful for spreading information and creating opportunities. | Explains why tiny social features (follows, lightweight sharing, referrals) can outperform giant in‑product billboards when you’re trying to grow. | Referral flows, virality loops, B2B invite mechanics, and anything community‑ish. | Bridging vs bonding social capital | Medium—classic sociology style, but the main punchline is super portable. |
|---|
5 No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering | Software engineering | 1987 | Frederick P. Brooks Jr. | Some complexity in software is essential to the problem itself; tools and processes mainly chip away at accidental complexity, so there’s no single magic fix. | Great reality check when someone thinks a new framework, methodology, or AI tool is going to save the release—helps you separate hard product problems from tooling drama. | Planning big rewrites, discussing tech debt with non‑engineers, and saying “no” to silver‑bullet vendor pitches. | Essential vs accidental complexity in software | Medium—short but dense; worth a slow pass. |
|---|