Home/Papers worth the commute/ConversationOllie MercerConversationlast month · on Papers worth the commuteOllie Mercer on “Papers worth the commute”Twelve papers I've genuinely read, mostly to prove my marking is statistically indefensible, best digested on a delayed Central line.6 likes8 commentsShareThe list this is aboutPapers worth the commute11 items8 commentsNewest firstCallum Hayeslast monthDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?ReplyOllie Mercerlast monthNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.ReplyOllie Mercerlast monthVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.ReplyAdd a reply — sign up to join the conversationReplyReport
Callum Hayeslast monthDelayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?Reply
Ollie Mercerlast monthNorthern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.Reply
Ollie Mercerlast monthVillain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.Reply
TheLysts
Delayed Central line is basically the peer review process for your soul. Did any of them actually justify grading on a curve or is that still a myth we tell freshers?
Northern line despair is a different genre entirely, respect. At least the Central lets you pretend the delay is why the p-values look wrong.
Villain's always the Tube, never the marking scheme. Twelve papers, zero statistical validity, one delayed train — proper British trilogy, that.